Jewish Resistance to the Holocaust Essay - 1452 Words

Examining any issue pertaining to the Holocaust is accompanied with complexity and the possibility of controversy. This is especially true in dealing with the topic of Jewish resistance to the Holocaust. Historians are often divided on this complex issue, debating issues such as how â€Å"resistance† is defined and, in accordance with that definition, how much resistance occurred. According to Michael Marrus, â€Å"the very term Jewish resistance suggests a point of view.† Many factors, both internal such as differences in opinion on when or what resistance was appropriate, as well as external, such as the lack of arms with which to revolt, contributed to making resistance, particularly armed resistance, extremely difficult. When considering acts†¦show more content†¦Unfortunately, it was very difficult to gauge when this point would come; the Germans were inconsistent in when they carried out the executions, as some were killed immediately and others were kep t alive for a time. Understandably, many Jews inaccurately predicted the time before their imminent deaths and therefore missed their chance at resistance. In addition to the living conditions in the ghettos and camps, many differences in opinion led to hesitance to engage in resistance, particularly armed resistance. There was a great deal of collective responsibility involved with resistance- some believed that to act out was to endanger everyone in the group. Unfortunately, these worries were often founded in truth. In one instance, when a man protested the death of his brother by calling the SS member a murder, he was removed to prison, where he passed away; all of the other members of his group, who had witnessed the incident, were killed as well. By punishing the entire group for the rebellion of one, the SS helped to ensure that others would know the cost of resistance, and therefore be less inclined to resist themselves. Another instance of the idea of collective responsibility was seen in the Vilna ghetto- when fugitives escaped the ghetto, their families, as well all of the JewishShow MoreRelatedEssay Jewish Resistance to th e Nzi Holocaust922 Words   |  4 Pagesinternal and external factors contributing to a lack of Jewish resistance to the Holocaust, there was resistance in existence in many forms; the resistance that did occur must not be diminished or overlooked. When considering the definition of â€Å"resistance†, historians divide themselves on what this entails; some believe it to be only active, armed resistance attempts, while others define it more liberally. According to Yehuda Bauer, resistance entails â€Å"any group action consciously taken in oppositionRead MoreJewish Resistance During WWII and the Holocaust884 Words   |  4 PagesResistance: it takes many forms, from the simplest denial to an armed revolt. The Jews exhibited almost every form of resistance against the Nazis which proved to the world the Jews are not that easy to extinguish. The Jews had several ways of exhibiting resistance, but Organized armed resistance was the most powerful form of Jewish opposition(Jewish Resistance). Armed resistance is an important aspect to revolting not only because it reinflicts the pain lashed upon the Jews, but it also showsRead More Examine the practical and the morale constraints upon Jewish Resistance during the Holocaust.1659 Words   |  7 Pages Jewish resistance throughout the holocaust has caused much debate among academics historians, and even governments. Historians conclude that resistance was practical and morally constrained throughout the Second World War, for a variety of reasons. Historians such as Rab Bennett, Michael Marrus, Richard L Rubenstein, and John K Roth all have written in detail about the constraints placed upon Jewish resistance throughout this period. Each of these explanations will be examined throughout this paperRead MoreThe Most Effective Resistance Against Nazis And The Holocaust?1719 Words   |  7 PagesCountries or Groups Showed the Most Effective Resistance Against Nazis and the Holocaust? Many events in the world have been documented in our history books, but sometimes forgotten. However, the reminisce of events that took place during the Holocaust are the ones that are never forgotten. Neither should the groups and countries that showed resistance towards Hitler. Because of the antipathy towards Hitler s regime, resistance towards Nazi’s and the Holocaust was a combined effort from many differentRead MoreHolocaust Resistance: The Largest Jews Revolt Holocaust Resistance958 Words   |  4 PagesHolocaust Resistance During the duration of the Holocaust, millions of Jews and other minorities found themselves at the mercy of Nazi commandment. Despite the threat of death hanging over their heads, Jews organized resistance groups and fought back their oppressors. Resistance came in all sorts, ranging from committing suicide and dying with dignity to lashing out and killing their captors (â€Å"Jewish Resistance to the Nazi Genocide†). Within the camps there were individuals who openly foughtRead MoreEuropean Jews Resistance during the Holocaust868 Words   |  3 PagesPeople’s understanding of resistance among European Jews throughout the Holocaust is a topic that has been vehemently debated by scholars from various fields of study. These scholars have produced multiple notions regarding the idea of resistance among European Jews, as the debate has developed significantly since the end of World War II. The definition of the term â€Å"Jewish resistance,† which has been used t o characterize a rather obscure concept, still continues to be a major point of contentionRead MoreReligion Fights Back1273 Words   |  6 PagesReligion Fights Back Introduction Before the Holocaust, Jewish people had ordinary lives. Children went to school, parents went to work or owned their own business. They carried on spiritual traditions and strived for their own goals. During the Holocaust though, Jews lost the meaning of life (Michalczyk 177). They were considered useless and a burden to the Germans. This was continuously beat into their minds not only mentally but also physically (Michalczyk 177). Some were able to beat theseRead MoreThe Tragedy Of The Holocaust1708 Words   |  7 PagesThe Holocaust is, by definition, a tragedy. HaShoah, the Hebrew word for the Holocaust, translates to â€Å"the catastrophe.† The very notion of humor during the Holocaust may seem incongruous, appalling, and wildly inappropriate. Tragedy is seen as serious, while comedy is typically lighthearted in nature. However, there is precedence for ‘comic relief,’ the presence of humor in tragedy with the desired effect to relieve tension. Frequently , comic relief is used so that tragedy does not overshadow usRead MoreEssay on The Jewish Partisans of The Holocaust1146 Words   |  5 PagesResistance during the Holocaust, both Jewish and non-Jewish, is a daunting task to cover. Information abounds in relation to this which leads to the problem of putting all of it into one paper. Due to this, I will only cover the specifically Jewish Partisan fighters. The movements are divided into two groups of Eastern and Western Fighters. Partisans fought in almost every European country including but not limited to Belgium, Poland, Russia, France, Italy, Greece, and Lithuania. â€Å"A partisan isRead MoreJews Were Complacent During The Holocaust1670 Words   |  7 PagesJews were complacent during the Holocaust. For most people, the only knowledge, if any, about Jewish resistance during the Holocaust comes from a fictional movie, Inglourious Basterds. While certainly based on facts, Inglourious Basterds is not a good way of expelling a myth. In actuality, and despite popular belief, Jews were not complacent during the Holocaust. They performed both violent and non-violent resistance against the Nazis, such as spiritual resistance, forming partisan groups, and starting

Citation and Plagiarism - 1836 Words

Plagiarism in an academic field is very unethical. There is no difference between stealing academic work that is not one’s own and going into a store to steal merchandise. The consequences for both offences are often harsh and life altering. One can lose credibility, lose a hard-earned reputation, be charged criminally, kicked out of school or be financially ruined by any judicial proceedings against them. The cost of saving a few hours of academic study is not worth it in the big picture of life of any student. Plagiarism is also a major problem for academic facilities as well. The schools could lose there accreditation if it was discovered the work of their students was not original but merely recycled work of other students or†¦show more content†¦Otherwise, you will be hiding someone’s ideas and suggesting it were yours (Fastfacts: Plagiarism and Academic Integrity, 2005, p.4). It is important to identify the difference between the information and idea from the source and your own. According to the â€Å"When to Document† paragraph 2, Avoiding Plagiarism (2006), common knowledge information does not require documentation. It defines common knowledge as â€Å"widely known information about current events, famous people, geographical facts, or familiar history† (When to Document, paragraph 2, Avoiding Plagiarism, 2006). Common knowledge may vary from person to person. It is a common knowledge to you but may not be for me. Generally, knowledge that could be found in a general reference book is common knowledge. With a lot of information in mind, some students start writing the paper with their own words and may not be aware that they have already implied someone’s information or ideas in their writing. As per Fastfacts: Plagiarism and Academic Integrity, 2005, p.10, golden rules of avoiding plagiarism, re-phrasing the information or ideas into your own words does not eliminate the need of citation. You must give credit in a citation reference page to the source of information even though you phrased them in your words. According to the articles â€Å"Seven Rules†, paragraph 2, Avoiding PlagiarismShow MoreRelatedPlagiarism and Citation Essay949 Words   |  4 PagesPlagiarism: Writing can be a difficult task for some people. For those people, before they start writing, the first thing they do is probably idea gathering, maybe looking for relate article on newspaper or magazine, look up some definition in the dictionary, check the World Wide Web, or even take a trip to the library. Often, they found what they are looking for, and before they know it, they start copying it, maybe a couple of word, few sentence, other people ¡Ã‚ ¦s idea, or they even copy theRead MoreEssay On Plagiarism1381 Words   |  6 Pagesyour eighth grade lesson on plagiarism and now you have no idea what it is or anything about it. On top of everything else, you now need to create a bibliography for a paper that if plagiarized, could cost you your entire grade for the class. Luckily for you, this paper will provide you with the definition of plagiarism, why you should document your sources, and information and differences between two citation formats, MLA and APA. What is plagiarism?, you ask. Plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involvesRead MorePlagiarism in College Work Essay example656 Words   |  3 Pages Plagiarism takes various forms. A student may cheat doing something as extreme as purchasing a paper, hiring someone to write a paper or turning in a paper freely provided by a friend. Many students unknowingly commit Plagiarism by failing to properly cite their sources crediting the authors. Still others cite, but plagiarize by coping much too much and writing far, far too little of their own synthesized thoughts and ideas. Students must be careful about copying too much. If a paper is mostlyRead MorePlagiarism: These Words Are Not Yours. Eddie N Hudson,1341 Words   |  6 Pages Plagiarism: These Words Are Not Yours Eddie N Hudson, Jr. Augusta University Abstract Plagiarism is a word that is introduced as early as elementary school. Students are encouraged when writing research papers to use their own words. The rough draft is marked with the stains of red ink and a comment saying â€Å"these words are not yours.† This paper will give you a definition and different types of plagiarism. You will also be provided with steps to prevent plagiarism. Citations areRead MorePlagiarism in Research Writing Essay1052 Words   |  5 PagesPlagiarism comes about when a person uses words or ideas from another person’s work but fails to credit the source of the ideas or words. Scholarly work of any nature mainly requires the writing of dissertations, treatises or term papers in the world of academia. Students in institutions of higher learning, as part of the course work, carry out research and present their results in the form of dissertations or term papers. The assignments’ formatting usually follows standards namely the Americ anRead MorePlagiarism in College Writing1077 Words   |  5 PagesPlagiarism in College Writing Introduction Plagiarism occurs in many forms. Self-plagiarism and inadvertent plagiarism are two forms of plagiarism. Students plagiarize for many reasons. Self-plagiarism is a form of plagiarism that is difficult to detect and often over looked. Inadvertent plagiarism is often caused by sloppy work and poor citation preparation skills. Proper education and practicing citations along with the use of online tools will assist the student inRead MoreEssay On Plagiarism1306 Words   |  6 PagesBenjmain Bell Professor Malena Prinzing CIS 50 21 September 2017 Plagiarism in College Work Plagiarism takes various forms. A student may plagiarize doing something as extreme as purchasing a paper, hiring someone to write a paper or turning in a paper freely provided by a friend. Many students unknowingly commit Plagiarism by failing to properly cite their sources crediting the authors. Still others cite, but plagiarize by copying much too much and writing far, far too little of their own synthesizedRead MoreCOLL100 QUIZ 21491 Words   |  6 Pagesin either the reference or citation.   B.omit the date in the citation but use the acronym n.d. (no date) in the reference page.   C.use the acronym n.d. (no date) in both the citation and reference.   D.bold the source. Question 3 of 20 0.5/ 0.5 Points Read this section of text from the APUS   Plagiarism Policy (2014,  http://www.apus.edu/student-handbook/academic-dishonesty/index.htm) :    The most frequently observed form of academic dishonesty is plagiarism. Plagiarism is the adoption or incorporationRead More The Problems of Plagiarism Essay1199 Words   |  5 PagesPlagiarism is an academic misconduct in which students use someone’s ideas or information in their work without proper referencing. While western culture insists that sources of words, ideas, images, sounds be documented for academic purposes, â€Å"plagiarism is now recognized as a serious problem especially in university where students are just copying words from web sites or someone else’s work† (The Owl At Purdue, 2007 ). According to East (2006, p.16), â€Å"many Australian universities are now developingRead MoreBe Careful Not to Plagairize Essay666 Words   |  3 Pages According to the Harvard Guide to Use Sources, it is considered plagiarism if you use a language or report and turn it in as your own without appropriately crediting the sources used. On the sources that you used to gather information, if you can not locate the author, make sure to scroll down and look everywhere for an author. If you cannot locate an author, make sure that you appropriately cite the website in your bibliography. Although it may seem obvious, while you use the Internet to gather

Employee Commitment on Organizational Performance †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Employee Commitment on Organizational Performance. Answer: Introduction: In an organisation, the effective communication plays an important role as the manager has to coordinate all the functions and employees which involves liaison. This role of manager not only requires the communication with the internal organisation but also to external environment which includes stakeholders (Yukl, 2013). Manager should include formal and informal communication in its channel so that easy transmission of information should be there. Development of personnel is a tedious task for manager as all the personnel comes from different backgrounds, following different beliefs, having different cultures and acceptability. There is always adoption of one common way so that each and every individual can follow, implement and learn. Setting up of the organisational goals by manager, shows the results which manager wants to achieve in the future course of time. Setting objectives and goals can be made easy when organisation is following the decentralisation; all the decisions can be taken without waiting for the approval by the top level heads (Alfes, Truss, Soane, Rees and Gatenby, 2013). Manager has to support the performance of individuals by giving them directions how to implement the task and achieve best results out of that. By proper communicating and coordinate the activities, manager can easily manage maintain the relation between internal and external environment (Cascio, 2018). Improving process and quality includes trained the new technologies and updating to employees on the job. Development of employees will lead to improvement in process and quality of products and proper vision by the manager should be there. Functions of Manager: Planning is nothing but a gap between where the company is standing today and where manager want that company to reach. All the decisions related to expansion, diversification and other activities are taken by the manager in planning decision. Company plans in advance what activities they have to do, how they will do it and who will going to perform that activity in the organisation. Organising refers to the arrangement of resources and assignment of duties to the employees and establishing authority relationship among them (Child, 2015). Organising includes all the allocation of work or tasks and resources to the employees for implementation of work. Staffing includes recruitment, selection, training and development of personnel and giving them adequate remuneration. This function performed by manager for the right selection of employees at right time for performing the task in the organisation. After following all these above functions, manager gives the direction to the employees how to implement the activity in real in the organisation for achievement of goals. Directing involves supervision over employees working, motivating them and communicating all the important information (Fayol, 2016). After all the resources are put in place, managers work yet not complete as he has to do the correcting work. This work includes measuring the differences in expected and actual results and if the results are not matching to the expectations then corrective measures were taken by the manager. Challenges and risks: Maintain the quality as well as quality in the time when prices are at its peak. Challenge for manager is to provide a good amount of quantity with good quality standards of product (Murray-Webster, and Hillson, 2016). Manager has to maintain the balance between the quantity and quality of the product in that particular cost only. Timely converting the goals or objectives into results is a job of manager. Manager has to complete the task with efficient utilisation of resources and within the time sanctioned. Updating the technology timely is a challenging task for a manager. Implementing new technology in a new organisation depicts employees smartness and ability to understand new changes done in the organisation. In a recent interview of Coca Cola Amantil, manager has accepted the fact that they are facing the problem in managing the risk and finding the new banks for the deposit of money. This is because of the reason that the credit rating companies has pushed the rating of company to the downside (Global Capital, 2012). The environment in which the business is operating is keeps on changing day to day. The manager has to work in that complicated environment and have to face the changes on daily basis. In the market there are always availability of new opportunities and threats the manager has to find that by scanning the business environment (Reason, 2016). Customers choices and preferences are changing very frequently. Now customer prefers to have more of health conscious drinks. Although Coca-Cola is offering a wide variety of products for diet conscious and health conscious customer but then also there is a high competition in the market as close substitutes are available like Pepsi. Impact of values, ethics and diversity on culture and role of manager: Values are just the fundamental beliefs of an individual and the principle of doing the right and justice within organisation and should have to follow the organisation prescribed values. The relationship between the employee performance and organisational values plays a significant role in the organisation for the employee satisfaction (Hannington, 2016). These values include optimum utilisation of resources, doing work with innovation and creativity, coordination with the employees, communication about information and grievances and showing integrity and loyalty towards the organisation. The value of the companies governs the policies, procedures, strategies and appraisals for the company. Values also affect the products offered by the company as it includes how the product will sale and to be offer to public. Ethics are the beliefs of an individual that governs their moral values, honesty, integrity, confidentiality and justice. Business ethics is a field in which cod of conduct of business has been followed by seeing corporate responsibility and taking social and legal factors in mind. Mostly businesses do the ethical advertisement of their product to have good brand image of product and Company in the minds of customers (Sacconi, 2012). Company tries to charge a price which is relevant as customers are price sensitive to this factor. If a company offers a product advantages and disadvantages with full transparency then this activity is considered to be an ethical. In Coca-Cola Amatil, the ethics and code of conduct of business in the organisation has been already defined that how individuals have to perform a role or activity in an ethical manner. This code of conduct includes honesty and integrity in the working of employees and these workings are transparent to the stakeholders. Coca-Cola is following the concept of providing the good quality products to the consumer. Decisions by individuals are made with justice, fairness and impartiality. Following ethics is important in every organisation as it increases the confidence in consumer that company is ethical in nature and its activities and does not provide any adulterated products (Thiel, Bagdasarov, Harkrider, Johnson and Mumford, 2012). It also increases the corporate goodwill of the company by ethical behaviour in society and can also reduce their financial liabilities. Diversity of culture is nothing but an individual values, norms and tradition which they follow and judge, interact, percept others on that basis. It is difference in the caste, sex, religion; culture and social abilities of an individual (Hofhuis, van der Zee, and Otten, 2012). Implementing diversity in the organisation is difficult as it include all individuals from different backgrounds and having different beliefs and influencing individuals to together come up with the same norms, policies and rules and beliefs cannot be done in a one stroke (Patrick and Kumar, 2012). So implementing a diversity culture adoption is a long way activity which managers have to perform. Coca-Cola also facing the diversity challenge as it has a wide geographical reach so it has to maintain the rules according to that only. The company has facing many problems because of diversification in culture like company is spending a high cost for maintaining the diversity. Company is providing training and mentoring regarding the diversity in culture throughout the branches in world (Irefin, and Mechanic, 2014). Coca-Cola is trying to maintain the work life balance possible for individuals. Some employees are also file suit on the company on the ground of discrimination on the basis of race or diversity. From the above discussion, we can conclude that the coca cola is a leading brand in the soft drink field. To manage this leading position, organisational structure is an essential component in the organisation and managing the structure is the work of manager. Manager is responsible for managing the structure effectively and efficiently while communicating and coordinating with all the related aspects affecting the organisation. Conclusion: In todays competitive environment, manager has to perform complex task and are facing many challenges in risk in operating the organisations working. Financial risk, dealing in dynamic environment, changes in consumer preferences all are working as a barrier for efficient working of a manager. Manager has to survive in the environment while following the rules and policies made by the organisation and also have to perform the activities according to the norms, values and in an ethical manner. Performing the activities in an ethical manner and coordinating with the diversified culture is also done by managers. Values, ethics are made in organisation for maintaining the same rules and regulations for all the employees and to have a corporate goodwill. For having an ethical and value image in the eyes of public, the company also do the CSR activities. Company can also use other methods for having an ethical image in the eyes of consumer like company can introduce a campaign, or can do t he promotional activities. References: Alfes, K., Truss, C., Soane, E.C., Rees, C. and Gatenby, M., 2013. The relationship between line manager behavior, perceived HRM practices, and individual performance: Examining the mediating role of engagement. Human resource management,52(6), pp.839-859. Yukl, G.A., 2013.Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education India. Trompenaars, F. and Hampden-Turner, C., 2011.Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. Nicholas Brealey Publishing. Child, J., 2015.Organization: contemporary principles and practice. John Wiley Sons. Fayol, H., 2016. General and industrial management. Ravenio Books. Global Capital, (2012).Interview: Coca-Cola Amatil facing challenges in managing credit risk. [online]. Available at: https://www.globalcapital.com/article/k39kwlmxhlkn/interview-coca-cola-amatil-faces-challenges-in-managing-credit-risk. [ACCESSED ON 27th march 2018] Reason, J., 2016.Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Routledge. Murray-Webster, R. and Hillson, D., 2016.Managing group risk attitude. Routledge. Hannington, T., 2016.How to measure and manage your corporate reputation. Routledge. Sacconi, L., 2012.The social contract of the firm: economics, ethics and organisation. Springer Science Business Media. Thiel, C.E., Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L., Johnson, J.F. and Mumford, M.D., 2012. Leader ethical decision-making in organizations: Strategies for sensemaking.Journal of Business Ethics,107(1), pp.49-64. Patrick, H.A. and Kumar, V.R., 2012. Managing workplace diversity: Issues and challenges.Sage Open,2(2), p.2158244012444615.. Managing workplace diversity: Issues and challenges.Sage Open,2(2), p.2158244012444615. Hofhuis, J., van der Zee, K.I. and Otten, S., 2012. Social identity patterns in culturally diverse organizations: The role of diversity climate.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,42(4), pp.964-989. Irefin, P. and Mechanic, M.A., 2014. Effect of employee commitment on organizational performance in Coca Cola Nigeria Limited Maiduguri, Borno state.Journal of Humanities and Social Science, pp.33-41. Keller, K.L., Parameswaran, M.G. and Jacob, I., 2011. Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Pearson Education India. Cascio, W., 2018.Managing human resources. McGraw-Hill Education.

The Five Factor Model of Personality Essay Example For Students

The Five Factor Model of Personality Essay The Five Factor Model of PersonalityThe precise definition of personality has been a point of discussionamongst many different theorists within many different disciplines since thebeginning of civilisation. Personality can be defined as the distinctive andcharacteristic patterns of thought, emotion, and behaviour that define anindividuals personal style and influence his or her interactions with theenvironment (Atkinson, Atkinson, Smith Bem, 1993: 525). It can be proposedthat personality psychology has two different tasks. The first involvesspecifying the variables on which individuals differ from one another. Thesecond involves synthesising the psychological processes of human functioninginto an integrated account of the total person (Atkinson et al., 1993: 532). We will write a custom essay on The Five Factor Model of Personality specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now There are many different theories of personality and many different theorists. The purpose of this essay is to examine the trait approach, specifically thefive-factor model. Both the development and limitations of the Five-Factor modelof personality shall be discussed. Trait theory is based on several assumptions. The first assumption isthat any difference between people that is seen as significant will have a name. Secondly, these names, known as traits, are conceived of as continuousdimensions. In general, trait theories assume that people vary simultaneously ona number of personality factors. These traits are of both the conjunctive anddisjunctive form. Therefore, to understand a trait, it is necessary tounderstand what a particular trait is and what type of behaviour is evidence ofthat trait. (Atkinson et al., 1993). Five factor theorists are one set of traittheorists. The claim of five factor theorists is that behaviour can be bestpredicted and explained by measurement of five dominant personality factors. Thefive factor theory is a fairly recent proposal and has its basis in earlier work,which shall be discussed. One of the statistical techniques most commonly used in the study ofpersonality is that of factor analysis: By identifying groups of highly intercorrelated variables, factor analysis enables us todetermine how many underlying factors are measured by a set of original variables. In other words, factor analysis is used to uncover the factor structure of a set of variables. (Diekhoff, 1992: 333)A factor analysis will generally show that a smaller numberof factors represents the same information as the original number of variables. Once the variables making up the factors have been identified, some of theredundant variables may be removed (Diekhoff, 1992). As such, a large number oftraits may be reduced to a number of personality factors. The procedure offactor analysis was a significant part of both the development and criticism ofthe five personality factor theory, as well as the theories on which it is based. An experiment conducted by Allport and Oddbert (1936, cited in Goldberg,1990) was based on the assumption that a dictionary contains a list of everypossible trait name. Oddbert and Allport took every word from a dictionary thatrelated to personality descriptors. This list was then revised to removesynonyms and unclear or doubtful words. Another researcher, Raymond Cattell(1945, cited in Atkinson et al, 1993) further revised the Allport-Oddbert listto 171 words. A study was then conducted by Cattell on a group of subjects whowere asked to rate people they knew on the 171 traits. The results were factoranalysed and 12 personality factors were found. However, 4 additional factorswere found by analysing self-ratings. Cattell concluded that, in the adult human,16 personality factors were dominant. Eyesenck, (1953, cited in Atkinson et al, 1993) was another majortheorist to use factor analysis. Although using the same basic approach asCattell, Eyesenck used a more discriminatory factor analysis which resulted infar less than 16 factors. Eyesencks major factors are introversion-extroversion and neuroticism. These are believed to be ordinal factors and assuch, scores on each dimension are independent of one another. The majority offuture studies concluded that the actual number of personality factors, forwhich there is significant evidence, is between Eyesencks two and Cattells 16. Since Cattells study, many researchers have conducted similar studies,or re-analysis of Cattells original data. Most of the researchers, such asNorman (1967, cited in Merenda, 1993) found support for far less than 16personality factors. At most, it was generally concluded that there are betweenthree and seven factors of personality. As a compromise, many researchers agreethat there are five personality factors, as suggested by Normans original work(1963, cited in Goldberg, 1990). Support for the Five-Factor model comes fromcurrent researchers such as McCrae and Costa (1985) and Goldberg and Saucier(1995). Opposition to the theory is also abundant, such as the work of JackBlock (1995). .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c , .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c .postImageUrl , .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c , .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c:hover , .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c:visited , .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c:active { border:0!important; } .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c:active , .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u34f865965123d27f67d1db25e558b88c:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Business Ethics EssayAll trait theorists agree that there is a finite number of traits onwhich people have a score. The exact number of traits is still currently apoint of contention amongst theorists. However, today we believe it is morefruitful to adopt the working hypothesis that the five-factor model ofpersonality is essentially correct. (McCrae John, 1992: 175). There is alsostill disagreement among analysts as to factor titles (John, 1990: 96). Manywriters have adopted the names used by Norman (1963, cited in Goldberg, 1990)which are; extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stabilityand culture. For simplicity, this is the version of the five facto r model thatshall be adopted for this essay. The best known limitations of the five factor model of personalityrelate to the problems of trait theory in general. Trait approaches are directedprimarily at specifying the variables of personality. There is little dealingwith the dynamic processes of personality functioning. Traits are staticentities and more complete theories of personality, such as those of Eyesenck,come from a combination of trait theory with another psychological theory. Forexample, Eyesenck adopted a learning theory to combine with trait theory. Assuch, trait theory, and therefore the five factor model, do not deal with alarge aspect of personality: change. Mischel (1968, cited in Atkinson et al. 1993) is perhaps the best knowncritic of the trait theorists. Basically Mischel states that the underlyingassumption of the approach may be untrue: people may have such dynamicpersonalities that they do not possess trait-like characteristics. Mischel alsoclaims that there should be a high correlation between scores on a trait measurefor a subject and performance in a situation where that trait is evoked. However,according to Mischel, the correlation is extremely low. Mischel further arguesthat knowing a persons traits does not help predict their behaviour andmeasures of the same trait do not correlate highly with one another. Althoughthis criticism seems almost perfect, there is still a large number of traittheorists. Their responses to Mischels criticism shall be evaluated. The main defence of the trait approach comes in two forms. Firstly aconceptual form in which Mischels understanding of what makes up a trait isquestioned. The second form of defence comes from a methodological perspective,where the measurement of trait behaviour is examined. To be able toappropriately comment on trait theory, it is important to understand exactlywhat a trait is. McCrae and Costa (1995) suggest that not every person has everytrait. Therefore it is possible to confuse descriptors of behaviour with traits. There needs to be consistencies of behaviour to evidence a trait. Also traitscan be of either a conjunctive or disjunctive type. It has been suggested thatthe evidence suggested by Mischel is invalid because aggression was seen asconjunctive when it is actually disjunctive. Correcting this mistake couldsignificantly increase the correlation between different measures of the sametrait. As such, one criticism of Mischel may be answered. The second defence of trait theory examines the research method used byMischel. It is proposed that it is necessary to have many more than oneobservation of behaviour, before comparing behaviour to trait scores. Thereasoning behind this argument is that each trait test has at least 20 to 40items. As such, there should be at least half as many observations. A singlequestion test would be unacceptable and therefore a single observation ofbehaviour should also be unacceptable. Another possible experimental error mayhave occurred due to moderator variables. Moderator variables such as sex ofsubject may change the correlation between behaviour and trait scores. If thesevariables are controlled for, the correlation may significantly increase andMischels criticism may need to be re-evaluated. Cattells 16pf, the predecessor of the five factor model, also had asignificant limitation. The 16 pf had a low predictive power of performance ofa subject on a given test, when used alone. However, the personality profileswhich can be created using the 16pf are reasonably effective in an appliedsituation in predicting adjustment of an individual entering a particular group. Also, the performance predicting power of the 16 pf can be improved by givingthe 16pf and correlating it to some measure of the persons performance. Multiple regression can then be used to weight each of the 16pf factors so thatcorrelation between the 16pf score and performance is at maximum. This gives amore satisfactory prediction of performance using the 16pf, yet its predictivepower is still quite low. The 16pf is still used in many applied situationsbecause no other psychological tool is available with better predictive power. .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9 , .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9 .postImageUrl , .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9 , .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9:hover , .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9:visited , .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9:active { border:0!important; } .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9:active , .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9 .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u6f4e7497bc17ee4a5130e853376f86a9:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Breast cancer 2 EssaySince the five factor model is based on the 16pf, this limitation is alsoapplicable to the five factor model. It is possible to suggest that the limitations pertaining to the traitapproach and 16pf are insignificant or not applicable to the big five model ofpersonality. However, there are limitations that specifically relate to thismodel. Jack Block (1995) and Dan McAdams (1992) are the main theorists toevaluate the five factor model specifically and examine its limitations. Blocks criticisms are answered by theorists such as McCrae and Costa (1995) andGoldberg and Saucier (1995). The basis of Blocks argument is that it is uncertain that all importanttrait-descriptive terms are representatively distributed in language. Forinstance, collectively suppressed traits might be unrepresented. Another majorpoint is that the Big Five are very broad and might not differentiate accuratelyenough for practical applications. For example, assigning people to high, middleand low on each of the factors gives 243 personality types, which may be enoughtypes but doesnt solve the broadness problem. Block suggests a few changes toprocedure should be adopted but admits my suggestions are mild, obvious andentail scientific sobriety coupled with slow, hard work aiming to educe orderfrom the present jumbled empiricism characterising personality psychology. (Block, 1995: 209). Both Costa and McCrae (1995) and Goldberg and Saucier (1995) suggestthat Block has lost sight of why the five factor model was developed. Blockcriticises the model for not being applicable to practical situations when itspurpose is to describe the full range of personality traits. Blocks criticismalso does not distinguish between the Big Five model from alternativemodels of the causal underpinnings of personality differences (Goldberg Saucier, 1995: 221). A large amount of crucial evidence supporting the Big Fivemodel is also left out of the criticism. Each reply also suggests that Blocksclosing suggestions provide few specific proposals of alternative models. McAdams (1992) critical appraisal of the five-factor model outlinesseveral major limitations. McAdams views the five-factor model as essentially apsychology of the stranger, providing information about persons that one wouldneed to know when one knows nothing about them. It is argues that because ofinherent limitations, the Big Five may be viewed as one important model inpersonality studies but not the integrative model of personality. Some of thelimitations described are those applicable to all trait theories and one appliesto the 16pf and any theories based on the 16pf. However, two limitationsspecific to the five factor model are discussed. The main limitation specific to the five factor model of personality arefirstly a failure to offer a program for studying personality organisation andintegration and secondly a reliance on statements about individuals by otherindividuals. The extent to which the five-factor model is a major advance inpersonality study therefore depends on what is hoped to be gained in the field. If personality study is interested in the study of observers trait ratings, thebig five model is extremely useful. If the purpose of the field is also toinvestigate observers attributions about individual differences the five-factor model is less significant. If the study of personality aims to emphasisethe whole person and the dynamic nature of personality, the model seems to beonly of minor concern. As such, from the view of multifaceted personology, thefive-factor model is one model in personality not the model of personality(McAdams, 1992: 355). In conclusion, the support and criticisms of the five factor model arenot as black and white as would be hoped. Each argument has logical reasoningand can provide evidence to support itself. Each view also has a large number ofsupporters. Neither one is necessarily correct, as it is possible for the modelto be applicable at some stages, and not applicable at others. As a result, itis probable and acceptable to conclude that the five factor theory may or maynot be an appropriate model of personality. Perhaps a comparison of how muchsupporting literature there is for each argument is a useful method for decidingwhich theory an individual may choose to support. Philosophy